A Seminal Moment in Kingsport History
I was in Nashville last week to donate a couple of old newspapers to the Tennessee State Museum. The Museum has many old newspapers in its collection. But it didn't have anything from one of the most momentous occasions in Kingsport history, the day the Eastman exploded.
The newspaper's coverage is exemplary. It was an all-hands-on--deck approach with the paper even calling in a local wedding photographer to help on the coverage. If you were alive at the time, you remember where you were when the Eastman exploded.
It
was Oct. 4, 1960, when the sky thundered, the ground shook, and all eyes looked
toward Long Island, where an enormous black plume of smoke was gathering.
Everyone's initial thought was: It's the Big One. The word around town for
years had been that Kingsport was on Russia’s target list, because of Holston
Ordnance, where unknown tons of bombs and explosive material were stored.
It
was the Eastman Explosion, a phrase that endures 60 years later.
Where
were you when you heard the Eastman explosion? Was a bonding question among
locals for years.
Longtime
Eastman employee Pete Lodal, who spent two decades studying the Eastman
Explosion, says, "I've never run across anybody who grew up around here
who doesn't know the answer to that question."
The
Eastman explosion wasn't the Big One, Russia wasn’t bombing Kingsport. But it
was Kingsport's Big One, the greatest tragedy in city history.
Yellowed
copies of the next day’s Kingsport Times are stored away in many Kingsport
homes, the front page headline a grim reminder of that terrible, terrible day:
"Blast Toll 13" and underneath were company pictures of the dead.
Two
more men died after the newspaper’s deadline. Another lingered for two years
before succumbing to injuries from the explosion, bringing the final total to
16.
That
issue of the newspaper published a timeline of the explosion, accounts of
eyewitnesses, background on the Aniline Plant, where the blast was centered,
and previous Eastman accidents.
Everything
but why the plant exploded.
No
one in town was unaffected. Everyone seemed to know someone who was killed or
injured.
All
up and down Memorial Boulevard that October afternoon, wives and children were
standing in front yards, sitting on front porches, radios turned up, staring
down toward Brooks Circle, watching and waiting for loved ones.
Soon
a procession of men came walking up the road, their eyes vacant.
"What
happened?" they would be asked, and each would shake his head. "I
don't know."
An
internal Eastman investigation, released in January 1961, listed the cause of
the explosion as "not known."
That's
where the matter stood for decades. Then in 1995 Lodal, group leader of the
Plant Protection Technical Services, began looking into the event. Lodal quotes
former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill as to why Eastman continues to
study the explosion: “The farther back you can look, the farther forward you
can see.”
One
of the first things he found was the 1960 employee handbook, a 104-page guide
to benefits and regulations. On page 52, at the beginning of the safety
section, was a picture. Next to the caption "Always Work Safely" was
a photo of Building 207. The Aniline Building. That was the building that would
explode later that year.
"If
you believe in omens, there it was," says Lodal.
Lodal
studied photos, pored over architectural drawings, interviewed chemists and
engineers and anybody who would talk to him about that day. He wanted to find
out what happened.
It
was his unsolved mystery, a safety engineer's obsession about a Kingsport
disaster that could have been much, much worse. "The explosion happened at
4:43 p.m. If it had happened 15 minutes earlier, there would have been 80 to
100 men in the change house next door."
The
change house was leveled by the blast. "Fifteen minutes earlier and it
would have been 10 times worse."
In
the photos he saw hydrogen storage tanks nearby that were untouched by the
explosion. "I shudder to think what would have happened."
As
it was, there were 16 lives lost, 45 other people hospitalized at least one
night, hundreds treated and released, and a town traumatized.
In
dollars, Lodal says it was a $4.5 million capital loss.
"That
would be $60 million to $80 million today. Plus it was out of commission six
months. So you have hundreds of millions of dollars with property damage and
lost business."
Why
did it happen? Why did Building 207 explode? Lodal has come up with what he
considers a logical answer to that question.
He
admits it's speculation. No physical data remains to prove it. But he makes a
convincing case.
"The
people who designed the Aniline Plant paid close attention to safety. They just
didn't know what they had."
What
they had was a process that involved a couple of chemicals that began with
"nitro," the same nitro that is in nitroglycerine, and a refining
process that wasn't as well understood then as it is today.
"It
was not one thing," he stresses.
There
were new titanium pipes, just brought online. There may have been corrosion in
some of the older pipes. And there were those chemical processes.
"They'd
been having trouble all day," Lodal says of the Aniline Plant on Oct. 4,
1960.
Several
of the gauges indicated the line was running hot.
"About
an hour before the explosion they brought in an instrument mechanic." They
thought the gauges were wrong. They weren't.
The
explosion had the force of six tons of TNT, completely leveling Building 207.
The next day there was no need for dump trucks to haul away debris from
Building 207. It had all been blown away.
But
much of the force went downward, creating two craters, each about 12 feet deep.
If it had blown outward, the devastation would have been much worse.
As
it was, three employees were killed by the detonation. The other 13 died from
flying debris.
Six
months later, Eastman formed a Reactive Chemicals Committee to study and
promote safety issues. That committee went through several names and branched
into numerous subcommittees, but half a century later it still meets monthly,
and its purpose remains the same: to make sure that a similar tragedy never
happens again.
The
list of the dead published by the Kingsport Times the next afternoon was an
microcosm of Eastman’s draw to surrounding counties for hires. There were
employees from all over the area.
There
were two from Indian Springs, another from Blountville, one from Jonesboro, one
from Church Hill, one from Fall Branch, one from Telford, one from Hiltons,
Virginia, and five with Kingsport addresses.
Usif
Haney and Jess Ray Shell, who were listed as missing and presumed dead, were
both at ground zero when the blast occurred.
Usif’s
son Bruce says his father had been calling his mother all day, reporting on the
problems at the new aniline facility. First he told her he wouldn’t be able to
come home for lunch. Then in late afternoon he called to say he would have to
stay late.
Harold
Manis, who wrote a recollection of that day for the Dobyns-Bennett alumni
newsletter The D-Ber, in 2005, remembered, “It was about 4:15 P.M. when I asked
Usif Haney, who was in charge of the building, if he needed us to stay over
after hours. His answer was 'Everything looks good, go on home. If I need you,
I will call you.' I can still see him leaning against one of the handrails when
he said that.”
Manis
was sitting in traffic at the intersection of Center Street and East Sullivan
Street, when he looked over at the drug store on the corner. “A lady was
walking out of the door, and had only taken a couple of steps, when the large
plate glass window blew out just behind her. My car also shook.”
Manis
turned his car around and drove to the hill overlooking Eastman at Borden
Mills.” It only confirmed what I already knew in my mind. It was the Aniline
Plant.”