The First Tennessee-Vanderbilt Football Game in 1892
The
First Time Tennessee Played Vanderbilt - 1892
I called
Bruce Haney in November 1982, the day after Vanderbilt defeated Tennessee in
football 28-21. I wanted to know what my old UT roommate thought because
Vanderbilt hadn’t beaten Tennessee since 1959 and usually could be counted on
as a reliable win for the Vols. “I knew Vanderbilt would beat us again sometime,”
he said. “I just didn’t think it would be in my lifetime.”
Logical
thinking from an engineer. In Bruce’s lifetime, between 1947 up until that 1982
defeat, Vanderbilt's football record against Tennessee was 2 wins and 33
losses. Vanderbilt won in 1948 (28-6), when Bruce was one, and 1959 (14−0).
And then
the shocker in ’82.
It wasn’t
always that way, as students of Vanderbilt football – if there are any – know. Vanderbilt
was once a Southern football power. General Robert Neyland was hired by UT in
1926 to “get Tennessee football up to the level of Vanderbilt.”
With
Tennessee and Vanderbilt set to face off this Saturday in a game that actually
means something, it might be a good time to look back at the rivalry’s
beginnings in 1892. The in-state rivals actually played twice that season, home
and away.
It was
only Tennessee’s second year of fielding a football team and the first year had
not been promising. Tennessee lost its only game.
But 1892’s
season got off to a smashing start with Tennessee traveling to nearby Maryville
College and prevailing by a score of 25-0, the first win ever for a Tennessee
football team. (Not really a big deal since the team had only played that one
official game in its inaugural season of 1891.)
Next
up were the lads in Nashville and Tennessee fans, what there were of them, were
optimistic.
The anonymous
scribe of the Knoxville Sentinel noted of UT’s “Crack Football Team:” “The
University of Tennessee has the best football eleven this year that the institution
has ever been able to boast, and the boys think that last Saturday's victory at
Maryville of 25 to 0 in favor of ‘our side’ will be followed by many others. E.
A. Cannon, of Harriman, an ex-Yale man, has been engaged to coach the crack
eleven and will doubtless bring the team up to its highest possible degree of
development.”
Since
sideline coaching was banned at the time, coaching essentially meant playing.
Cannon (who was actually Princeton ’89, not Yale) would play fullback after
that first game with the team. Eligibility was apparently not a thing then.
Scheduling
and scoring were quite a bit different in 1892, too.
College
football at that time was less a sport and more a polite excuse to legally maim
your classmates. The forward pass was still illegal (thus no “Manning” on the
UT roster), so the “strategy” mostly involved everyone smashing into everyone
else in formations like the famous Flying Wedge - basically a human battering
ram that occasionally produced a touchdown and frequently produced concussions.
Protective gear was optional, meaning most players suited up in whatever
patched-up laundry they owned, plus maybe a leather nose guard if they were
feeling daring.
Yale’s
legendary coach Walter Camp had started shaping the rules - downs, the line of
scrimmage, five-yard grid marks - so sportswriters could call it “scientific”
football with a straight face. But most of the game boiled down to 22 guys on a
field making it up as they went along. And amazingly, most of them lived to
tell the tale.
The Crack Eleven of UT would take the train
(no buses or cars yet) over to play Vanderbilt on Friday Oct. 21st - game time was 10:30 a.m. That’s right, in
the morning. Then the Crack Eleven would take the train south to play Sewanee
College’s Crack Eleven on Saturday morning. Football games on consecutive
mornings.
“Foot
ball,” as it was spelled then, was such an alien sport that the Knoxville newspaper
writer felt compelled to educate his readers:
“So
many attempts have been made to explain the American-Rugby game of foot ball to
the uninitiated on paper and the result has been always attended with such
partial success that it has come to be said of this sort of football as of many
other things: ‘IT HAS TO BE SEEN to be fully appreciated or even understood.’
“To
the ignorant observer a modern game of foot ball looks very much like a
friendly free fight over a brown watermelon and the more you learn about the
game the more you are disposed to adhere to this first impression, with a
slight correction regarding the watermelon part of it.”
Let’s
just say the trip west to Nashville and on down to Sewanee didn’t go as the few
football followers in Knoxville had hoped. (How few? 200 would attend the
Vanderbilt rematch in Knoxville a month later.)
The headline
in the afternoon Nashville Banner told the story:
After
a Hard Fought Battle the Home Boys Win by the Score of 22 to 4.
Yes,
Tennessee scored 4 and no, it wasn’t two safeties. Scoring was different in
1892: a touchdown was worth four points, the kick after counted for two points.
A field goal was worth 5 points, a nod to the name foot ball. And the
game was played in two 45-minute halves.
Here’s
sportwriting 1892 style:
“A
splendid crowd saw the formal opening of the fall athletics at Vanderbilt University
to-day, and cheered and waved hats and fluttered handkerchiefs.
“Vanderbilt
opened the game with a poor attempt at a wedge, going ten yards through a hole
in the centre. Now well into the fight Vanderbilt picked up and in short rushes
beat their opponents back, Allen, Barr, Jones, Fletcher and Craig figuring
prominently. Jones fumbled the ball once, but Knoxville kept it but a moment,
and when Vanderbilt again got possession of it, Jones broke through in a mighty
effort, backed and guarded beautifully by the whole eleven, and scored the
first takedown. Time, 5 minutes; score, Vanderbilt 4, Knoxville 0. Throne
kicked good, score, Vanderbilt 6, Knoxville 0.”
What
followed in the newspaper was a running summation of the scoring. Give the
writer a break; he had a deadline to meet. After all the story of the morning
game appeared in the afternoon paper!
Here
are the highlights of the rest of the game, most of them lowlights for what the
Banner called “the Knoxvilles.”
Tennessee
scored on a 25-yard scamper by C.D. Brown with 38 minutes left in the first
half but the kick by George Marfield failed. Score 6-4.
A series
of short rushes lead to a Vanderbilt touchdown, a failed kick, and it was 10-4
at the half.
“The
Knoxvilles” wouldn’t score again.
The Banner
wrote, “During the intermission the Knoxville sympathizers were sure their men
had the best wind, and would outlast the Vanderbilts, and the Vanderbilts were
of the same opinion. But the balance of the game showed differently.”
The only
excitement came thirteen minutes into the second half.
“When
Vanderbilt got possession of the ball they began again their trick of short,
hard rushes, and after ten minutes of steady advance, Burch pressed over the
goal line. But the ball happened into the air. It was a critical moment. But it
is safe for Vanderbilt. Throne reached up, clasps the flying leather and slides
over Burch to the third touchdown.”
The
score was now 16-4.
“Knoxville
seemed to have lost heart. They fumbled the ball, ran heavily and made weak
breaks against centre.”
Vanderbilt
scored once more and it was over. Had there been a scoreboard it would have
read 22-4.
Back
in Knoxville the game merited only a single paragraph and that seeming to offer
an excuse for the loss:
“NASHVILLE,
October 21 -- The foot ball game between the Vanderbilt and University of
Tennessee team resulted in defeat of the University of Tennessee team by a
score of 22 to 4. Marfield, of the Knoxville team, sprained his ankle.”
And thus
began the 133-year history of Tennessee-Vanderbilt football.
It continued
in Vanderbilt’s favor until the Knoxvilles hired General Robert Neyland in 1926.
From
1892 till 1926 Vanderbilt won 18, lost 2 and tied 3.
Since
Neyland’s arrival the record is 79-14-2 in Tennessee’s favor.
Tennessee
has won the last six.
Going
into Saturday’s game, Tennessee is ranked 18th, Vanderbilt is ranked
12th and vying for a spot in the college playoff. For a change Tennessee
is looking to play spoiler.
Tennessee
is a 2.5 point favorite.
The game
is at Neyland Stadium, named for the man who turned the rivalry around.
The V or Flying Wedge from the 1892 Harvard-Yale game (no photos exist of the 1892 UT-Vanderbilt game)
Who
was UT’s first football coach?
According
to the all-knowing Wikipedia, it was J.A. Pierce who was hired in 1899 and
guided the team for five years.
The Knoxville
Sentinel of 1905 would disagree.
Here’s
the proof from an October 11, 1905 story:
COMES
BACK TO KNOXVILLE.
E.
A. Cannon Will Engage In Business Here, After Absence of Ten Years.
E.
A. Cannon, who was the first football coach at the University of
Tennessee, being in charge of the team in 1892, is in the city, and will make
Knoxville his future home. He has been residing in Syracuse, N.Y., for the past
ten years, where he has been very successful in the engraving business.
Who
was on that 1892 team?
Tennessee
took 14 players on its travel team to Nashville. For a frame of reference, the
current Tennessee Athletics Department has listed on its staff directory 19
assistant or associate athletic directors.
Here’s
how the Knoxville Sentinel described that 1892 squad:
“THE
CRACK ELEVEN:
“James
Fisher, center rush; ‘Daddy’ Brown, right guard; Lynn White, left guard; Charles
Farris, right tackle; Edwin Werts, left tackle; Albert Wegener, right half back;
C. D. Brown, left half back; John Cox, right end; George Marfeld, left end;
Howard Ijams, quarter back; Charles Moore, full back. Substitutes, C.H. Reed and
William Bates.” Plus newly engaged E.A. Cannon.
About
that very first game a year earlier in 1891….
Here’s
how the Knoxville Journal and Tribune described it:
SEWANEE
WON.
Our
University Boys are Not in it With Them.
Special
to the Journal.
CHATTANOOGA,
TENN., November 21. — The down train
this a. m. brought forty-six Knoxville boys from the University of Tennessee,
who came to meet the Sewanee boys and contest for the foot ball championship of
the state. The Sewanee team came the night previous. Sewanee wore purple colors,
Knoxville the orange and white and the two teams have owned the town. A heavy
rain had been falling all day and the boys played in the rain. About one
hundred people witnessed the game. Sewanee won easily by a score of 24 to
nothing. After the game all of the boys took in the theatre.
Theatre!
It
wasn’t a Marvel action film. There were no movie houses in 1892.
But Chattanooga
did have an Opera House and the boys probably took in the matinee production of
the play “From Sire to Son,” starring “distinguished Actor and playwright
Milton Nobles with the gifted ingenue Dollie Nobles.”
Where
did Tennessee play their home rematches with Vanderbilt and Sewanee (both also
losses)?
They
played on their new home field “purchased by Dr. Dabney [University President] for
this purpose in the Riverside addition. This field is situated on a level piece
of ground midway between the terminus of the Riverside street car line and the
river and is in every way admirably adapted for the purpose.”
It
would be a wonderful ending to this story if Riverside Field had grown to
become Neyland Stadium. It didn’t. It is now a parking lot on the edge of the
Tennessee River, near the east side of the modern-day Neyland.
But there
is a bit of a happy ending. The week after the second loss to Sewanee, Tennessee
defeated the Chattanooga Athletic Club 16-6 giving Tennessee a 2-5 record in
just its second season of football.











